The Spanish Civil War - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 6 Words: 1838 Downloads: 2 Date added: 2019/05/18 Category History Essay Level High school Tags: Civil War Essay War Essay Did you like this example? Tratando De Cambiar El Mundo: The Theater of the Spanish Civil War The Spanish Civil War is burned into Spains collective memory perhaps their greatest scar, and it has created a permanent effect on their languages, art, literature, and theater. The theater in Spain at the time was used as a vehicle for change, and the contemporary theater that depicts it shows that just as it was used for change then, it is used to encourage change and healing today. In the 1930s, Spain was a country in turmoil. Unrest between the divided elite and working classes and the devastation that the Great Depression wreaked on Spains existing economic problems meant that the people were desperate for change. In 1936, Spains socialist party won a narrow victory against the nationalist party, and they immediately put their plans for reform into effect. They sought to secularize the government, create labor unions, and enact other reforms that threatened the wealthy elite that had been in power for so long. The widespread violence that resulted from the nationalists attempt to seize power back from the republicans is now known as the Spanish Civil War. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "The Spanish Civil War" essay for you Create order Much of the war was fought not with weapons, but with propaganda. Both the republicans, also known as the Popular Front, and the nationalists used education and the arts in their cultural crusades in order to justify their respective ideologies. A key weapon in this fight to win over the populace was theater. Seeing its importance and efficacy in conveying messages to the people, both sides went as far as to establish official organizations to create and circulate their brand of cultural instruction (Parker 215). On the left, the Alianza de Intelectuales Antifacistas (alliance of antifascist intellectuals) created several groups: Nueva Escena, Teatro de Arte, y Propaganda, and Guerrillas Teatrales. On the right, the nationalists had the Junta Nacional de Teatros y Conciertos (national committee of theatres and concerts). Both sides wrote essays explaining the roles of the theater in their respective ideologies, and while the right thought restoring Spanish theater to the days of autos sacramentales and mystery plays would best serve their mission, the left wanted to purge the bourgeois plays thathad dominated Spanish stages, and instead return the stage to the masses with avant garde political plays (Parker 215). Reaching into the theatrical roots of Spain has propagandistic power, and both the left and right sought to claim cultural images to prove their dominance as the true essence of Spain (Parker 216). Nationalist playwright Gimenez Caballero likened the goals of theatre to a bullfight:a series of symbols that inherently lead the spectator to the absolute truth of the divine (Parker 219). Incredibly, the companies of both sides performed several of the same Golden Age plays in order to convey their discordant messages. Lope de Vegas Fuenteovejuna and Calderons La Vida es Sueo, were performed by both the republicans and nationalists during the Spanish Civil War. Both plays were deemed to be accessible constants in Spanish culture that could be bent to serve their respective ideological agendas. Lope de Vega became an especially strong symbol for the cultural legitimacy of the nationalist party. Strangely enough, however, both sides also found use in the old religious autos sacramentales a nd performed them often. The right used them to combine their ideologies with the universal truth of Catholicism in an attempt to make the two inextricable in the minds of the audience, while the left favored them for their didactic potential (Parker). However, the republicans were still able to extort the religious imagery that did not fit in with their ideology. Delgado writes, the deity becomes, rather than the Christian God, an amalgam of various totemic conepts which teatro de urgencia represents in solemn, semi-mystical terms: People, Land, Spain, the Workers Republic, and, as might be expected in a country which practices Mariolatry, Mother. The military training of the republicans largely relied on improvised propagandist plays. The propagandist theater they used to teach and rally support for their cause was called teatro de urgencia (theater of urgency), and the fervor that went behind its creation is evident in the name. Teatro de urgencia was performed on the front lines and nearby towns, and was created with three goals in mind: to instill confidence in the people of the republic, to reinvigorate the faith of the soldiers, and to teach recruits appropriate behavior. In every play of teatro de urgencia, the audience is meant to relate to the central character of each: the soldier, or milicano (Delgado 51). Delgado writes, In his doubts and fea rs, strength and hope, a collective Everyman figure emerges from the corpus of the texts, and, just as his medieval counterpart [in autos sacramentales] undertook a journey towards the heaven of unification with God, so too can the miliciano be seen in teatro de urgencia at various stages of a journey toward an afterlife which is victory (51). The journey Delgado refers to is framed by the republican ideology, and is meant to symbolize the devotion to their cause that they want the audience to strive for. The tactic was specific, pointed, and effective. One example is Max Aubs Pedro Lopez Garcia. In the play, the titular character is convinced that he can remain neutral in the war, and that it wont affect his life. This changes when he is forcibly enlisted in the nationalist army. In the trenches, he is visited by Death, who shows him visions of a nationalist soldier killing his mother and their animals, and destroying their land. He is too frightened to desert, but when La Tierra appears to him with his mother in its skirts, he gathers the courage to return to your brothers trench (McCarthy 55). Pedro Lopez Garcia both demonizes the enemy and glorifies the journey back to the side of the republic. McCarthy writes, for the republican propagandists, therefore, it is as if, having won Pedro Lopez Garcia from the loyalist trenches, their subsequent mission is to translate his faith into deeds, when, reappearing as milicanos in subsequent teatro de urgencia, he continues on a journey in which spiritual conviction is emphasized more than spiritual comfort (55). Pedro Lopez Garcia, and many other plays of teatro de urgencia resemble a sheep being herded back to God, and the symbolism is no coincidence. Religious symbolism and references are abundant in teatro de urgencia in order to convince the audience that the path of the republicans is a righteous one. Despite the years since its end, the scars of the Spanish Civil War are still felt in Spain today. Carlota Leret, whose father was executed during the conflict, says, This is not a historical event that is buried in the past, but something that is very fresh in the memory of Spaniards (New York Times). The truth in this is evident. Playwrights still write about the impact of the Spanish Civil War on their people, and on the world, . One example is Ay Carmela! written by Joso Sanchis Sinisterra in 1986 to mark the fiftieth anniversary of the war. The set is sparse, and the play takes place in an unspecified region of Spain. This ambiguity is intended to help let all memories of the war come forth to exist and be addressed in the space. The play follows performers Carmela (who is dead in the beginning of the play) and Paulino who accidentally cross from republican territory into nationalist territory. They are apprehended and are forced to perform for the nationalist forces despite witnessing an execution and other horrors at their hands. Of the play, researcher Helena Buffery writes, Radically open in structure, through its mimicry of the cyclic, repetitive patterns of trauma and melancholia, the play closes with a short epilogue in which the culture of forgetting accepted by Paulino in order to survive under Francoism is set against the culture of remembering the past, championed by Carmela, in a world of the dead which, though increasingly distant from the world of the living, seems to become the only place where resistance is possible (865). The cyclical pattern of Ay Carmela! echoes the futility and trauma of the Spanish Civil War and how the fallout has lasted, even though the first shots of the conflict had been fired fifty years prior. In more recent history, Laila Rip olls plays have shed light on the effects of the war on those that were not directly involved. In her 2005 play, Los Nigos Perdidos, Laila Ripoll exposes the atrocities and abuses that the children of Republican families underwent in religious orphanages and social assistance hostels after the end of the war. The protagonist is Tuso, a grown man with special needs, who remembers his childhood after experiencing a hallucination. He then relives these memories as a child in a religious orphanage, where one child was thrown from a window by a nun, and others were starved or beaten to death. Raquel Garcia-Pascual writes, These events are remembered by means of ghostly evocations, which in the play communicate their fear faced with the apparition of death symbolically and physically knocking at their door, personified in the figure of the Sister, in several prolepses of the ending (449). The play is shown through the lens of a child, and features puppets, masks, and childrens language. The play also depicts the transport of children on livestock trains without food or water. Those who did not die were repatriated without permission to homes around Europe and South America. A new surname gave these children an identity, but most were silenced and forgotten (Garcia-Pascual). Los Nigos Perdidos finally gives these forgotten children a voice. It lays bare the abuses and confinement they experienced, and leaves them in the audiences memory. At the end of the play, Tuso says, Decidieron no dar parte para no montar un escendalo. Total, ya erais nigos perdidos. Al fin y al cabo, los nigos de aque no existen. Son como fantasmas y nadie va a reclamar por ellos. They decided not to give you a part to avoid a scandal. You are forgotten children. In the end, the children of this place dont exist. They are like ghosts, and no one is going to claim them (Ripoll 310). Ripoll uses th eir story to condemn the history and suffering that is silenced, and to resurrect their memory. The Spanish Civil War was a bloody, turbulent time in Spains history, and the repercussion still echo throughout the country. It is written into the memory of its people through art, literature, and especially theater. The propagandistic theater of the Spanish Civil War was used as a vehicle for political change in the 1930s, but the contemporary theater that sheds light on the war and its devastating effects on its people is used to enlighten audiences today, and help them work through the past. Works Cited https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324398874_Francoist_repression_and_moral_reparation_in_the_theatre_of_Laila_Ripoll Anderson, Tim. Chapter One: Prelude to War. Spanish Civil War, Great Neck Publishing, 2009, p. 1. https://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/23/world/europe/23wargames.html

An Influence Of World War 1 - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 9 Words: 2562 Downloads: 7 Date added: 2019/05/15 Category Society Essay Level High school Tags: War Essay World War 1 Essay Did you like this example? World war 1 was controversial because it was an important war that took place in our history. Many things did happen during this time that had a positive and negative effect.This war took place for 4 long years.This will include the life before the war,how it started,life during the war,the political leaders,non-combatants,generals,spies,soldiers,the strategies and intentions, and how they lived after, and what positive and negative effects did it have? This period of time was a transition. The U.S had most of the power, that was called the great power. 1910, came around and they took the stand to lead through the industrial power. Other countries had some control, but the U.S was the most powerful. They did have cars but they were not as advanced as they are now, they were slow. They mostly used a carriage and a horse to get around. People would find out news through papers, and radios. Women were still discouraged. People looked at them as if they were more frail than men. Women would stay home and take care of the inside of the house and av efood ready for the men. If they did have children than the women would take care of them. They did not get the chance to go and do the job like men. If the women did get a job outside the house it would take place at a textiles industry, thats where they would design clothing,yarn,and etc. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "An Influence Of World War 1" essay for you Create order When they did get the chance to work outside their home their income was still not as high as men. Men got paid the most, but they also still had responsibilities. Their job would to work on the outside of the home. They also worked on the farms,factories,and any job that had to do with heavy duty. They made sure they supplied the materials their family needed. They were the ones that mostly paid the bills around the house because they made more money. It was easier for men to get jobs because they would say the are stronger and harder workers than women. Before the war the women did a protest. The protest was a group of women that were known as the Suffragettes. This group went and protested that women should be equal to men, and have their right to go and vote. This protest was a group of women that were formed in 1897.That is how the life would be before the war. Now the war is beginning on July 28,1914. The great war, as it was known to a generation aware that another, great war would soon follow,began relatively inconspicuous in August 1914 when forces of the Austro-Hungarian empire invaded the tiny Balkan nation of Serbia.(page 584) After that other nations jumped in and started a big fight. Little things added to the world war 1. The war did start after an assassination. Before the assassination there was things that added up to a war. This goes back to the year of 1839. In 1839, Britain had a saying that they would protect Belgium this was during the treaty of london. Than that saying was going and years went by and a war was going on in 1871 that was called the Franko prussian war. Germany goes and starts things up by taking seats away from france, they were called alsace and lorraine. Germany Takes control over france and goes and bugs Austria Hungary. This starts a dual alliance, han france starts things up with Russia. This keeps going on for years. Then thats when an Bosnian serb named Gavrilo princep was in charge of Archduke Franz Ferdinand death. Him and his wife were killed. They were taking a trip to Bosnia and Austria province. The assassination cause the world war 1, other things triggered it but this was the main cause. After the assassination Germany and Austria goes along and invades Serbia. While Russia jumps in and they go and take over Germany and Austria. France and Russia dont have beef so GErmany will go and invade France because Russia invaded them. When Germany went to invade France they went through Belgium and ibaded them. Then that is when Belgiums got mad at the Britains because they said they would protect them and they didnt, so they started to go to war. World war 1 lasted for 4 long year and it went back and forth.That is how the war started, now lets see how life was during the war. Life during the war was hard. Families like women and children were away from their husband and or dad for four years, and wouldnt know if they would see them again. While the men that had ro leave to go fight and to leave their wife and children hoping they come back alive.Women were not able to go and fight, it was only men. Men would either voluntary or told to go and fight. While this happened many jobs were opening because men had to go fight. From this it gave women a chance to work on farms and or factories. They needed people and their only choice was women. Women started to work at jobs that men had and would take care of their children. The world needed help because they lost so many men, so the children stepped up. During the war the children would help the women. They would dig holes for the food that needed to be planted. Carry the water to places it needed to be including wood. If they had younger siblings they would watch them for their mom. They would get blankets and fun things for the soldiers. Animals during this time were helping to. Horses helped carry weapon for the war and bring soldiers to certain places. Dogs would help by protecting places, and carrying first aid stuff and if someone needed to mail a message the dogs would deliver it. Soldiers did not have much shelter, they would have to hide places. In 1914 trenches were discovered it was a ditch that was very narrow and soldiers would go there for protection and to rest, to them it was like a shelter. The trenches were not that great though.,they were dirty, did not smell great. The bad smell came from not showering, the dead bodies that were around, and from the toilets and or people going to the bathroom anywhere. Also a bunch of different people would go in the trenches that diseases started to form. Not all soldiers liked going in trenches because they were not to keep them safe, most of the time when a soldier went in they are scared. Its like they are living in a scary place, they worry all the time. Sometimes there would be a distance between trenches, and it would be called a no mans land. Any soldier was scared to walk in that space and or to switch trenches because they might get attacked.When the soldiers did go in the trenches they would get covered in mud and sometimes it went higher.Sometimes the mud went so high and and it was very thick so when the soldier goes in the mud it would be hard to get out and they would get stuck and never be seen again. In the trenches there was rats found.The rats would keep coming because they would spot out the food, and go in the mud. In the war there was many different generals leaders. Every country had a leader that they would follow,the leader would demand the soldiers to do things. Douglas Haig,was a commander and a general for Britain. He was born in Edinburgh thats located in Scotland. He was the one that was in charge of the corps when Britain first went to war with Germany.He was looked at very well because the soldiers he was in charge of fought very fiesty and well. He never gave up on his army and kept fighting. Than another one was Marshal Philippe Petain, he was considered a saver for Verdun.He was agenral that would go and have verduns back and kept the french army together. A commander in chief that goes and force with Europe. He was in charge and told the soldiers what to do. He was known under the name of John J. Pershing. Ataturk had to do the role of keeping the enemies away. He was a commander that would be for the seventh army. He also was known for being the person that started and was in ch arge of the national movement that took place during the war that was for independence. A major success happened and he went higher to run the german army he did this with Hindenburg. Even though he was successful running the army they did have downfalls, the year 1918 his army was not that great they went down hill and were not fighting great. Alfred Von Tirpitz was an admiral thats for Germany. He was in charge to be prepared for the pre war and prepare the navy for germany. He had a submarine that did not help him much and made him leave in 1916. Next there was political leaders that were during the world war 1. Kaiser Wilhelm led germany to fight and to get more power because he thinks they should have more power. He was the one that took some blame for Germany influencing of them taking charge of the war. Next this person did not think America should go to war, that they should stay out of it. Later on 1917 came around and things started to frustrate him, After that in that year that when he finally wanted to go to war and they did against Germany. This was Woodrow Wilson. A minister of Uk that was in 1916 organized the britains. He tried fixing things and improving stuff to make them become more successful. He had an idea that he hoped made them have an advantage it was called a war cabinet and contained five people that were key in it. V.lenin was also a leader in world war 1. He was part of the Russian revolution. He was the person that successfully brought peace he had the russian revolution agree with the mean peace treaty that was with germany and they let the problem go. Many men went out to fight for their country. These men sacrificed their life for their country, knowing they have a fifty-fifty chance of not coming back to their family. Many soldiers did not return home he was killed the last year of the war which is 1918. He was one of the top soldiers, and was a hard fighter and never gave up. His name was Baron Manfred Von Richthofen. A next soldier that also lost his life the last year of the war was Wilfred Owen.He lost his life going to a trench. His death was in action and he volunteered to go and fight. A soldier T.E Lawrence was an officer too, he was part of the British. He helped form arabs they would fight against Ottoman empire. Some countries had strategies they planned out, they use different weapons that are more advanced and would help them out. Germany started off fast by doing different things, they had an idea that no one else did. In the trenches they would dig to their enemy spot n use an explosive to blow it up. Next both enemies would try to dig to the enemies spot, but it would not work out all the time. When this happened they started to fight. They would not have any strong weapons so they used their digging materials and would beat up the other opponent. The beginning of the war neither country had powerful weapons, but as days went on fighting new things were brought into the war. This included tanks, machine guns, mortars,deadly gasses, a flamethrower and more. The tanks were useful but not always. The tanks could get stuck easily because the mud would soften and it would not move so it doesnt benefit the team. Than machine guns were very powerful in the beginning of 1914. Not every country had a machine gun so whoever did made damage to the enemies. As the war went on by the end in 1918 every country and person had one so it was not as powerful. The gasses would get used to throw in an enemies trench. They would throw it when they know people are in their trenches. When it was windy the country that threw glasses had to wear masks so they would not kill themselves. Lastly another strategy was flamethrowers. Flamethrowers was invented from the Germans. There strategy for this was to throw it and it catch land on fire so the enemies could not pass it. I believe this war had both positive and negative effects. Some examples of these positive effects is, people received better understanding of how to use air power, better technology and more people getting to travel to foreign countries. Positive effects war tends to have is they speed up technological effects and developments. This was definitely the case for WW1. Examples of this may be, the invention of tanks, the effect of improving the engine. Which then concluded to the everyday use of the automobile. Although, the war had great effects on technological equipment; it also had a positive effect for women. The war helped women recieve opportunities such as, giving women jobs that were previously only considered by men and giving women the vote in 1919. The war also helped women in their social outlook forever. Yes WW1, had many great positive effects on the people. However, it also came with negative effects as well. One big negative effect was the suffering and deaths of the war. Approximately, 17 million people died and 20 million were injured. Many people also died because of the diseases the war caused, which led to an even greater number of deaths. Another negative effect was the war actually brought no peace to europe or the world itself. Many casualties and bad effects happened because of the war, such as, the eruption of many wars. Wars such as the russian civil war and the effect of WW1 in the Versailles Treaty, played a role in causing the start of WW2. Other major casualties were many dangerous weapons were created. Bibliography https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-i/world-war-i-history This source was very useful. This helped me on many things and finding out facts and the problems in the war. It also talked about how the war was started and who fought against who. https://www.biographyonline.net/military/wwi/people-first-world-war.html This source helped me find important people. It also told me what they were and what country they had helped. This would tell me how the people not just the soldiers. I used this when I talked about the soldiers, generals, political leaders, and more. https://www.history.com/news/life-in-the-trenches-of-world-war-i This is where I got my details for how life was during the war, and how the soldiers lived in their trench. Trenches were not amazing and enjoyable as it may seem like. Trenches did not protect the soldiers, the enemies still found out ways to destroy or hurt them.

Developing Effective Communication in Health Free Essays

In this assignment I will be going to explain the factors which can impact upon effective communication and interpersonal interaction and discuss the importance of communication in a  health  and social care settings. Communication is a process that involves the exchange of information, thoughts, ideas and emotions. There are many ways of communicating and this can be done verbally and non-verbally. We will write a custom essay sample on Developing Effective Communication in Health or any similar topic only for you Order Now We have many reasons of communicating with each other, and these are to express ourselves as well as to pass on information and knowledge. Effective communication involves verbal and non-verbal interaction. In a health and social care setting, one to one communication is very important. This simply means two people have a conversation without any other person joining in. This would be used in many health care settings such as doctor consultations, child and social worker meetings. Often times, these conversations will be about personal things such as illness or a difficult home life, but it could also be something as simple as a doctor talking to a colleague. The doctor will build a relationship with his patient; the patient will trust him and will feel like she’s in safe hands. When you start a conversation with someone you don’t know well, you should always try to create the right kind of feeling. It is important to create a positive emotional atmosphere before you go on to discuss complicated issues or give people information. Someone with a disability may need a particular language and a way for him to communicate, for example if the person is deaf he could use Signing. Signing is an effective way of communicating the deaf and hard of hearing. It’s effective because signing is the main way to communicate with the deaf and can sometimes be the only way of communicating with a certain deaf person. Therefore signing would be used in any setting where needed. Informal communications builds relationships among staff members and service users, and face-to-face interaction is the primary way people communicate informally. Communication we all use it day to day, we talk and interact with people around us. Communication is really important because that’s how we send messages to each other and different people. There are two different ways of communicating which are verbal and non-verbal. Effective communication in he health and social care setting is very important as it allows the health care worker to perform their role effectively, allowing them to work alongside their colleagues whilst developing supportive ties with the users of the service who come from different types of backgrounds, cultures/ and religion. People with communication disabilities are at risk of not being able to communicate effectively with their health care professionals and this could have an impact di rectly on their health. Good communication is the foundation to successful relationship i. e. patient and carer, either through verbal or non verbal communication. Non verbal communication is a  form  of interpersonal interaction by gesticulating and eye movements. Non verbal communication skills (Body Language) improve relationships by helping to accurately read people’s emotions they are feeling, creating trust and responding to non verbal clues to show that you understand notice and care what the patient is saying. Effective communication between colleagues is very important in a health and social care context. Respect and trust should be shown throughout communication with your colleagues otherwise this can affect the way you speak to others such as service users. Formal communication would usually be used in communicating with colleagues, but sometimes informal may be appropriate. It can be used within meetings or speaking one to one with each other. Communication is so important within colleagues so it has to be done properly and effectively. It’s important because colleagues need to communicate with each other for such things like passing on vital information. Someone with a disability may need a particular language and a way for him to communicate, for example if the person is deaf he could use Signing. Signing is an effective way of communicating the deaf and hard of hearing. It’s effective because signing is the main way to communicate with the deaf and can sometimes be the only way of communicating with a certain deaf person. Therefore signing would be used in any setting where needed. You would use effective formal communication in an interview. You will need to talk clearly and using formal English. This will make you seem more professional a doctor will use effective formal communication when talking to a service user, by doing this the service user will feel comfortable and confident that the doctor knows what he’s doing. How to cite Developing Effective Communication in Health, Essay examples

Microeconomics Elasticity of Demand

Question: Discuss about the Microeconomics for Elasticity of Demand. Answer: Introduction: The present essay seeks to analyze the elasticity of demand in the context of real life scenario. Elasticity of demand depicts that the change in quantity demanded for a certain good due to change in other demand influencing factors. Elasticity of demand is categorized as own price elasticity of demand, income elasticity and cross price elasticity of demand. Price elasticity of demand explains the changes in quantity demanded due to any proportionate change in price of that product. Income elasticity of demand depicts the change in quantity demanded for 1% change in income of the individual (Barbier, Czajkowski Hanley, 2016). As stated by Baumol Blinder (2015), if change in quantity demanded is more than the change in price, the good is called elastic good. The essay applied this theory to the housing price fluctuation in Calgary, Canada and the change in car purchase trend among the young people reviewing two different articles. The first article reviews the housing price fluctuation across US cities. This paper highlights several factors affecting the housing price fluctuation in these cities. Head, Lloyd-Ellis Sun (2014) described the impact of change in per capital income on the change in housing prices. This paper has studied that income elasticity for the housing prices in US cities are greater than 1 as housing price moved more rapidly than changes in income level. This scenario implies that any shock in income or increase in come, increases value of living of people in the city. Household increases search activities with the improvement in standard of living. As per findings of the research, ratio of buyer to seller increase in the economy. It implies that demand increases more than proportionately compared to supply due to increase in search activities. Increase in demand put pressure on the housing prices rapidly as the rising price reflects the resale value of the house by home owner in future per iod. As a result value increases rapidly with the increase in transaction price. Hence, it can be concluded by reviewing the paper that income elasticity of demand for the selected US houses is greater than one. Calgary in Canada faced drop in housing price rapidly, due to weak labor market condition and overbuilding of housing. Due to weak labor market, income of people has not risen significantly and hence, demand has not been changed much (cbc.ca, 2016). Therefore, fall in demand for housing in the market is due to low increase in income. Income elasticity of demand in the real estate market of Calgary during 2015-16 is low. The second paper reviews the car purchase behavior among the young population as an application of elasticity of demand. Belgiawan et al. (2014), found that the car purchasing behavior is different among students between developed and developing countries. Students of developed countries are less desired to purchase a car as per the study. Car purchase intention varies across countries. The study does not find any correlation between the change in demand for car purchase and the change in income level. Rather the study has found positive correlation between future independence and the intention to buy a car in the future. Change in income thus has been found to have no influence on the change in demand in car. Main driving factor in this respect is change in expectation for future independence. Young consumer behavior for car purchase is hence is not significantly influenced by the change in income level and change in price of the product. A psychological factor works more to determine the demand for the product. They view car as a necessary goods, which can meet their satisfaction at different point of tile of life. Hence, it can be stated that income elasticity of demand is very low to influence changing demand for car among young population. Elasticity of demand theory and its application has been presented through above analysis showing that the application of the theory in two different context. Among the three types of elasticity, income elasticity of demand has been applied into two contexts. The first reviewed paper has been used to apply this theory on the housing market. It has been seen that demand for housing changes in the US cities more than proportionately than changes in income. Income elasticity in these cities is very high. A small change in the income level induces housing demand to change more than proportionately. On the other hand, the income elasticity in the housing market of Calgary is low due to labor market inefficiency and sluggish change in income. The second example shows that change in car demand among young people is not influenced by the change in either income or price level. References Barbier, E. B., Czajkowski, M., Hanley, N. (2016). Is the income elasticity of the willingness to pay for pollution control constant?.Environmental and Resource Economics, 1-20. Baumol, W. J., Blinder, A. S. (2015).Microeconomics: Principles and policy. Cengage Learning. Belgiawan, P. F., Schmcker, J. D., Abou-Zeid, M., Walker, J., Lee, T. C., Ettema, D. F., Fujii, S. (2014). Car ownership motivations among undergraduate students in China, Indonesia, Japan, Lebanon, Netherlands, Taiwan, and USA.Transportation,41(6), 1227-1244. cbc.ca (2016). Calgary housing market red flagged again in latest CMHC report. Retrieved 5 April 2017, from https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/cmhc-red-flag-fall-housing-assessment-calgary-1.3822560 Head, A., Lloyd-Ellis, H., Sun, H. (2014). Search, liquidity, and the dynamics of house prices and construction.The American Economic Review,104(4), 1172-1210.